(Press ESC key, type in an integer which is the topic number, then press the ENTER key to gain quick access to the topic you are looking for)

Why is the theory of repulsion field the denial of Newton's gravitational law?

Hardy Newman, a Vietnamese physics theorist, has concluded that Newton's gravitational law is not always hold true. Once poor-neutron matter, the matter that is made of 118 well-known chemical elements, is converted into rich-neutron matter in some extreme conditions, gravitational field produced by the matter disappears but the repulsion field will come in place instead. Hardy Newman calls Newton's gravitational law a half-true-half-false law and the theory of repulsion field is exactly the denial of Newton's gravitational law.

Hardy Newman also believes that matter does not directly produce gravitational field nor repulsion field. In a video posted in his Youtube channel: Newman Online College, he believes that matter produces something else in the middle and this "something else" in the middle, in turn, produces either gravitational field or repulsion field depending on the conditions in which the matter is. Meanwhile, Isaac Newton concluded that matter always directly produces gravitational field.

The denial is presented in a video posted on his Youtube channel: Newman Online College and embedded in this page as follow:

and in another video titled The theory of repulsion field - the denial of Newton's gravitational law and the theory of dark matter and embedded in this page as follow:

In the latter video, Hardy Newman has also argued that the theory of dark matter cannot work. Because if dark matter can keep stars staying still, it must also keep planets staying still. It is impossible for dark matter to distinguish between a star and a planet. So, what happens if planets were kept staying still by dark matter? They would fall into their central stars and there would be no such planet to be observed today. However, the theory of repulsion field has explained how stars are kept staying still but planets are not. The difference between a star and a planet, according to Hardy Newman, is the percentage of rich-neutron matter that they contain. Stars are big enough to contain a significant amount of rich-neutron matter at their cores, but planets are small heavenly bodies and contain a very small amount of rich-neutron matter at their cores. So, the interactive forces between a star and another nearby star include both attraction force and repulsion force, and none of them prevails against the other.

However, interactive force between a planet and its central star include mostly attraction force and very weak repulsion force. In other words, in a stellar system, the attraction force between a planet and its central star prevails against the repulsion force. This is the key to the difference.

To watch other videos on the topic of the theory of repulsion field, please SUBSCRIBE the channel by clicking the link below.

Click here to SUBSCRIBE to https://www.youtube.com/@NewmanOnlineCollege

Click here to view this page in Vietnamese language

DONATION AT YOUR DISCRETION

Newman Online College (NOC) always intends to provide worldwide learners, especsially those who cannot afford or those who have no time to take expensive courses, with free knowledge of various subjects.

However, as with any other organizations, in order to sustain its normal operation and development, for example, to sustain the normal operation of this website, NOC needs some funds.

At your discretion, if you wish to donate some of your funds to NOC, you could donate the funds to NOC's Paypal account by clicking this link: https://www.paypal.me/HardyNewman, or by clicking the image on the right. The following is other pieces of information possibly needed:

• NOC Paypal account's email address: newmanonlinecollege@gmail.com
• NOC Paypal account's Merchant ID: 4W38PBSCK2ADC

NOC would always thank you for your goodwill.